timea3
Cathlete
Really, I am shocked.
Yesterday I checked Craigslist Fitness Forum and I saw a post about P90X. So I wrote that I did both P90X and STS and I think STS was more fun it is not boring because you do something different every workout and that I like Cathe and she is the best. And somebodies answer was this.
No she's not < 2Fit4u2 > 07/09 20:39:26
and doesn't deserve a description anywhere near "the best." Clicked the link provided by 'penny' and immediately determined from the opening, still photo that both she and her background cohort were using improper form to demonstrate a basic 'concentration curl.'
That alone, was enough to conclude that this person was not an expert and that additional information provided by her would follow along the same substandard line. So I took the video tour, even though I didn't need any additional proof, and of course I was right. If she couldn't master such an easy , basic exercise such as the 'cc' after 26 years- am I supposed to believe that she can pull off the really hard stuff?
The sad part is that you believe her because she looks good; the vile part is that she teaches and charges you for information that is most certainly less than the best.
I am shocked. First I don't like her because she looks good I like her because of her great workouts. Just like my husband said I hope Cathe looks good just imagine a 200lb trainer or a blind eye doctor. Ok, and that she is not an expert. This person is right she is more than that. I think she just saw the STS price and she got shocked.
Yesterday I checked Craigslist Fitness Forum and I saw a post about P90X. So I wrote that I did both P90X and STS and I think STS was more fun it is not boring because you do something different every workout and that I like Cathe and she is the best. And somebodies answer was this.
No she's not < 2Fit4u2 > 07/09 20:39:26
and doesn't deserve a description anywhere near "the best." Clicked the link provided by 'penny' and immediately determined from the opening, still photo that both she and her background cohort were using improper form to demonstrate a basic 'concentration curl.'
That alone, was enough to conclude that this person was not an expert and that additional information provided by her would follow along the same substandard line. So I took the video tour, even though I didn't need any additional proof, and of course I was right. If she couldn't master such an easy , basic exercise such as the 'cc' after 26 years- am I supposed to believe that she can pull off the really hard stuff?
The sad part is that you believe her because she looks good; the vile part is that she teaches and charges you for information that is most certainly less than the best.
I am shocked. First I don't like her because she looks good I like her because of her great workouts. Just like my husband said I hope Cathe looks good just imagine a 200lb trainer or a blind eye doctor. Ok, and that she is not an expert. This person is right she is more than that. I think she just saw the STS price and she got shocked.



